Traditional leak testing was never designed for repair guidance. It shows leaks, but does not support engineering decisions. Smoke testing relies on experience, and DOP provides only pass/fail results.
Rushed manual handling causes inconsistent results across different operators.
Faster testing leads to unstable data and unreliable batch results.
Smoke testing depends on operator experience.
Leak repair lacks quantitative confirmation.
Engineered for Quantitative Verification
We convert leak testing into a quantitative closed-loop process.
Quantitative Scanning
Solves
The problem where leak points cannot be quantified to support repair decisions.
Scanning process samples downstream particles point-by-point to calculate local filtration efficiency.
Standard-Based Judgement
Solves
Subjective results caused by relying on operator experience and visual observation.
Automatic judgement of whether a position is a leak based on standard limit values.
Standard-Based Judgement
Solves
The inability to confirm repair effectiveness immediately after the fix.
Immediate re-test after repair to verify effectiveness.