Traditional leak testing was never designed for repair guidance. It shows leaks, but does not support engineering decisions. Smoke testing relies on experience, and DOP provides only pass/fail results.
手動での処理を急ぐと、異なるオペレータ間で一貫性のない結果が生じる.
テストを高速化するとデータが不安定になり、バッチ結果の信頼性が低下します.
Smoke testing depends on operator experience.
Leak repair lacks quantitative confirmation.
Engineered for Quantitative Verification
We convert leak testing into a quantitative closed-loop process.
Quantitative Scanning
解決します
The problem where leak points cannot be quantified to support repair decisions.
Scanning process samples downstream particles point-by-point to calculate local filtration efficiency.
Standard-Based Judgement
解決します
Subjective results caused by relying on operator experience and visual observation.
Automatic judgement of whether a position is a leak based on standard limit values.
Standard-Based Judgement
解決します
The inability to confirm repair effectiveness immediately after the fix.
Immediate re-test after repair to verify effectiveness.